{"id":5569,"date":"2021-05-31T15:08:15","date_gmt":"2021-05-31T14:08:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sesc.cat\/the-invisible-zoonosis-i-salmonella-in-pig-meat\/"},"modified":"2022-03-24T18:55:50","modified_gmt":"2022-03-24T17:55:50","slug":"the-invisible-zoonosis-i-salmonella-in-pig-meat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sesc.cat\/en\/the-invisible-zoonosis-i-salmonella-in-pig-meat\/","title":{"rendered":"The invisible zoonosis (I): Salmonella in pig meat"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><em>Salmonella<\/em><\/strong> is a major<strong> foodborne pathogen<\/strong> worldwide. A total of 91,857 cases of salmonellosis were reported in the European Union during 2019 (EFSA 2019), of which 8,730 were registered in Spain.<!--more--> The ingestion of eggs and their products, followed by pork and pork products, are the foodstuffs most commonly implicated in human infections.<\/p>\n<p><em>Salmonella<\/em> is a bacterium that belongs to the <em>Enterobacteriaceae<\/em> family. The genus <em>Salmonella<\/em> is divided into two species, <em>Salmonella<\/em> <em>bongori<\/em> and <em>Salmonella enterica<\/em>. In particular, <em>Salmonella enterica<\/em> is divided into six subspecies, being <em>S. enterica<\/em> subspecies <em>enterica<\/em> responsible for most of the human infections. To complicate it a bit more, within <em>S. enterica<\/em> subspecies <em>enterica<\/em>, over 2,500 <em>Salmonella<\/em> serovars or serotypes have been described, depending on the different structural characteristics. To simplify the nomenclature, instead of reporting \u00a8the cause of the outbreak has been a <strong><em>Salmonella<\/em> <em>enterica<\/em> subspecies <em>enterica<\/em> serovar Typhimurium<\/strong>\u00a8, it is directly called <em>Salmonella<\/em> Typhimurium and even <em>S<\/em>. Typhimurium.<\/p>\n<p><em>S<\/em>. Typhimurium together with<em> S<\/em>. Enteritidis are the most common zoonotic agents. In humans, salmonellosis causes gastroenteritis with typical symptoms such as diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain and fever, which appear between 6 and 72 hours after ingestion of the contaminated food. Usually, the disease is self-limited and does not require antibiotic treatment. However, in severe cases, ciprofloxacin and cephalosporins are the most widely used antibiotics for its treatment.<\/p>\n<p>The establishment of <em>Salmonella<\/em> control programs in poultry farms at regional and autonomic levels have reduced the prevalence to less than 2%. However, in pigs at slaughter the prevalence is approximately 30% (EFSA, 2016). The latest reference studies positioned Spain as one of the countries of Europe with the highest prevalence in pigs, with 53% and 64% for fattening pigs and breeding sows, respectively (EFSA, 2008; EFSA 2009).<\/p>\n<p>In swine, salmonellosis usually affects recently weaned pigs and pregnant sows, producing bloody diarrhea. However, asymptomatic or subclinical infections are most common. <em>Salmonella<\/em> can remain in mesenteric lymph nodes or in the intestine for long periods of time, and can replicate and be excreted intermittently in faeces depending on different factors such as stress, transportation, etc. These asymptomatic carriers represent a reservoir of the pathogen, since they do not present clinical signs or visible lesions in the slaughterhouse, evading routine control systems.<\/p>\n<p>Different studies have demonstrated a number of risk factors associated to an increase in the excretion of <em>Salmonella<\/em>, such as reducing food intake prior transportation, transport and lairage. Waiting time facilitates the excretion of <em>Salmonella<\/em> and the horizontal transmission of the pathogen between animals. <em>Salmonella<\/em> contamination of carcasses is directly related to contamination of the skin prior to stunning. For this reason, it is essential to properly clean and disinfect the lairage and limit the waiting time as much as possible. If the floor of the stables is clean during the waiting period, the probability of skin contamination is reduced from 70% to 36% (Rossel et al. 2009).<\/p>\n<p>Different studies performed in the abattoir have detected a high prevalence of <em>Salmonella<\/em> in tonsils, and a positive correlation between prevalence in tonsils and its presence in carcasses. There are also studies that, in addition to tonsils, detect high levels of <em>Salmonella<\/em> in mesenteric and ileocecal lymph nodes (Scherer et al. 2008). Submandibular lymph nodes could also be a focus of cross contamination if incisions are made during inspections (Small et al. 2006).<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_4684\" style=\"width: 410px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4684\" class=\" wp-image-8595\" src=\"https:\/\/sesc.cat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Salmosesc.png\" alt=\"Cultivo en XLT-4, medio selectivo para Salmonella.\" width=\"400\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/sesc.cat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Salmosesc.png 576w, https:\/\/sesc.cat\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/Salmosesc-300x169.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-4684\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">XLT-4 medium culture, selective for\u00a0<em>Salmonella<\/em>.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>Stunning, bleeding, and scalding are critical points for <em>Salmonella<\/em> contamination. If stunning is performed with CO2, excretion of faeces easily occur facilitating skin contamination (EFSA 2010). If the animals enter the scalding tank very dirty, the probability of contaminating the water increases, therefore, it is very important to keep the tank temperature high and constant (60-62\u00baC). The amount of water in the tank is also a factor to consider. If this is insufficient, the proportion of organic matter in suspension increases and also the probability of contamination with <em>Salmonella<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>In general, stunning and bleeding are processes in which <em>Salmonella<\/em> contamination increases, whereas scalding, peeling and singeing generally decrease contamination (Bolton et al. 2002). However, the peeling equipment can be contaminated if the hair is dirty with faeces, therefore, its disinfection is important. Singeing also reduces contamination, its effect depends on time and temperature, which should reach 100\u00baC. Manual machines have been found to apply more continuous and specific heat to carcasses than automated singeing. Polishing, however, is a process that can be a source of cross contamination, since stainless steel scrapers and nylon brushes are difficult to clean (Delhalle et al. 2008), and also favor redistribution of bacteria to uncontaminated areas.<\/p>\n<p>Evisceration is the most critical point in the process, it is estimated that 55% to 90% of the carcasses positive for <em>Salmonella<\/em> are contaminated at this stage. During evisceration, there is a risk of gut perforation. Incisions during removal of the red viscera and intestine increase the prevalence of <em>Salmonella<\/em> in carcasses and in the gut, respectively. Therefore, it is very important to work with standard\u00a0 operating prodedures and to properly clean and disinfect knives with water at \u2265 82\u00baC, or equivalent methods. Some slaughterhouses add a cold water cleaning step after evisceration that helps decontaminate the carcasses. Others divert visually contaminated animals that go through a process of trimming of the contaminated parts. A recent study describes high levels of <em>Salmonella<\/em> after evisceration on the forelegs, head, sternum, and throat (Biasino et al. 2018). These types of samples are not normally taken during routine inspections<\/p>\n<p>During the splitting process,\u00a0 contamination may occur due to contact of the blades with the throat or spine, increasing the risk of cross contamination, therefore, cleaning and disinfection of the blades between animals is important. Thorough disinfection of machinery several times a day reduces cross contamination.<\/p>\n<p>To minimize the proliferation of bacteria, cooling must be done quickly and in such a way that the internal temperature of the carcasses is kept at \u2264 7 \u00baC. Carcases hooks must also be clean to limit cross contamination. A Belgian study (Delhalle et al. 2008), concluded that practices such as scalding with steam, second flaming after polishing, and complete cleaning and disinfection of the splitting machine several times a day were beneficial for reducing <em>Salmonella<\/em> prevalence at slaughter.<\/p>\n<p>The slaughterhouse process is a critical step in the production line to reduce and minimize the entrance of <em>Salmonella<\/em> in the food chain and protect consumers health. Therefore, it is essential to maintain a correct system of self-control based on the hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCP) as well as a high level of hygiene. Once the processing line becomes contaminated with <em>Salmonella<\/em>, this can easily spread across the slaughter line contaminating machinery, knives, carcasses and even workers.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Author: <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.cresa.cat\/blogs\/sociedad\/en\/author\/Lourdes%20Migura\/\">Lourdes Migura, IRTA-CReSA<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>References<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.efsa.europa.eu\/en\/efsajournal\/pub\/6406\"><em>EFSA 2019. The European Union One Health 2018 Zoonoses Report<\/em><\/a><\/li>\n<li><em>Bolton DJ, Pearce RA, Sheridan JJ, Blair IS, McDowell DA and Harrington D, 2002. Washing and chilling as critical control points in pork slaughter hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) systems. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 92, 893-902.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.efsa.europa.eu\/en\/efsajournal\/pub\/1377\"><em>EFSA. 2009. Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Salmonella in holdings with breeding pigs in the EU, 2008. Part A: Salmonella prevalence estimates. EFSA J 7:93 pp.<\/em><\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.efsa.europa.eu\/en\/efsajournal\/pub\/rn-135\"><em>EFSA. 2008. Report of the Task Force on Zoonoses data collection on the analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Salmonella in slaughter pigs. Part A. EFSA J 135:1-111.<\/em><\/a><\/li>\n<li><em>Rossel R, 2009. Analysis of factors associated with Salmonella isolation on pork carcass using bayesian networks. Journ\u00e9es de la recherche porcine, 41, 43-48.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Scherer K, Szabo I, Rosler U, Appel B, Hensel A and Nockler K, 2008. Time course of infection with Salmonella Typhimurium and its influence on fecal shedding, distribution in inner organs, and antibody response in fattening pigs. Journal of Food Protection, 71, 699-705.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><em>Small A, James C, James S, Davies R, Liebana E, Howell M, Hutchison M and Buncic S, 2006. Presence of Salmonella in the red meat abattoir lairage after routine cleansing and disinfection and on carcasses. Journal of Food Protection, 69, 2342-51.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S074000201730641X?via%3Dihub\"><em>Biasino a, L. De Zutter, W. Mattheus, S. Bertrand, M. Uyttendaele, I. Van Damme. Correlation Between Slaughter Practices and the Distribution of Salmonella and Hygiene Indicator Bacteria on Pig Carcasses During Slaughter. Food Microbial 2018 Apr;70:192-199. doi: 10.1016\/j.fm.2017.10.003. \u00a0Epub 2017 Oct 11.<\/em><\/a><\/li>\n<li><em>Delhalle L, De Sadeleer L, Bollaerts K, Farnir F, Saegerman C, Korsak N, Dewulf J, De Zutter L and Daube G, 2008. Risk factors for Salmonella and hygiene indicators in the 10 largest Belgian pig slaughterhouses. Journal of Food Protection, 71, 1320-29.<\/em><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/10.2903\/j.efsa.2010.1547\"><em>EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards; Scientific Opinion on a Quantitative Microbiological Risk Assessment of Salmonella in slaughter and breeder pigs. EFSA Journal 2010;8(4):1547. [90 pp.]. doi:10.2903\/j.efsa.2010.1547.<\/em><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Salmonella is a major foodborne pathogen worldwide. A total of 91,857 cases of salmonellosis were reported in the European Union during 2019 (EFSA 2019), of which 8,730 were registered in Spain.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":8597,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[179],"tags":[397,409],"class_list":["post-5569","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-porcine-2","tag-infectious-en","tag-zoonoses-en"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sesc.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5569","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sesc.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sesc.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sesc.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sesc.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5569"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sesc.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5569\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sesc.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8597"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sesc.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5569"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sesc.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5569"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sesc.cat\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5569"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}