BLOG
SESC case archive


17/03/2014 | Porcine
7

Granulomatous pneumonia (of unknown cause) in a pig

Microscopically these masses corresponded to an intense inflammatory infiltrate composed mostly by macrophages, scant eosinophils and a few multinucleated giant cells. Necrosis was not present. Sectionsof the mediastinal lymph node were also studied andthe same type of inflammation was fouind in them. It is therefore a granulomatous proliferative pneumonia and lymphadenitis.

Unfortunately the final cause of such an inflammatory reaction could not be determined. The tests performed included :

  • Ruling out a mycobacteriosis by Ziehl-Neelsen staining (Negative) and PCR against M.tuberculosiscomplex (Negative) and mycobacteria culture (Negative).
  • The presence of fungal structures was also discarded by means of a Grocott staining (Negative).
  • No presence of gram positive bacteria could be observed with Gram staining (Negative) and through standard microbiological culture (Negative).
  • Morphologically , it was also ruled that it was a process associated to parasites or a neoplasia.

If anyone has encountered similar cases or has an idea of what can cause this type of lesion, you are welcome to share it in the comments section at the end of this post.

The lesion affects all lung lobes and mediastinal lymph nodes.

The lesion affects all lung lobes and mediastinal lymph nodes.

When sectioned the masses have a whitish homogeneous colouration.

When sectioned the masses have a whitish homogeneous colouration.

Under the microscope one can observe a granulomatous inflammatory reaction with numerous multinucleated giant cells such as the one of the image.

Under the microscope one can observe a granulomatous inflammatory reaction with numerous multinucleated giant cells such as the one of the image.



7 comment(s)


  1. Andre Broes
    24/03/2014

    De : aavld-request@ucdavis.edu [mailto:aavld-request@ucdavis.edu] De la part de Glenn Songer
    Envoyé : 24 mars 2014 17:17
    À : aavld@ucdavis.edu
    Objet : Re: Granulomatous pneumonia (of unknown cause) in a pig

    This picture from Ted has gross lesions very much like what I saw in M. kansasii all those years ago.

    Glenn

  2. Andre Broes
    24/03/2014

    De : aavld-request@ucdavis.edu [mailto:aavld-request@ucdavis.edu] De la part de Ted Clark
    Envoyé : 24 mars 2014 13:53
    À : aavld@ucdavis.edu
    Objet : Re: Granulomatous pneumonia (of unknown cause) in a pig

    I agree with Glenn and Paco this still could be Mycobacteriosis. Here is a pic of a porcine lung that I received from a slaughterhouse many years ago. The lesions were similar to the case being discussed and after much searching on AF stains (probably both ZN and Fites) I did find some AF bacteria. No cultures done. If this pic does not display properly, someone tell me.
    Sorry I don’t have access to the block or slide to take a histo picture for you.

    Ted Clark
    Calgary

  3. Andre Broes
    24/03/2014

    De : aavld-request@ucdavis.edu [mailto:aavld-request@ucdavis.edu] De la part de Glenn Songer
    Envoyé : 23 mars 2014 20:24
    À : aavld@ucdavis.edu
    Objet : Re: Granulomatous pneumonia (of unknown cause) in a pig

    It doesn’t seem like a great possibility, but Paco might be right. I’ve seen lesions like you describe in both field cases (which are mainly infections of cervical and mesenteric LN) and in experimental cases (when the person doing the inoculation was a little careless — that was me, by the way) and inoculum was partially swallowed to try to infect LN) and partially inhaled (producing the subject lesions in lungs. The experimental cases occurred with both M. avium ss avium (just M. avium in those days) and M. kansasii. It might be worth digging up the methods for mycobacterial culture (Chuck Thoen at ISU should be a good source).

    Glenn

  4. Andre Broes
    23/03/2014

    De : aavld-request@ucdavis.edu [mailto:aavld-request@ucdavis.edu] De la part de Ramos-Vara, Jose A
    Envoyé : 22 mars 2014 16:38
    À : aavld@ucdavis.edu
    Objet : RE: Granulomatous pneumonia (of unknown cause) in a pig

    Despite not being typical of PCV2 infection, I assume that this animal was tested for with negative results. It resembles hairy vetch eosinohilic granulomatous nephritis in cattle. Only one animal affected in the herd? Apparently Actinobacillus porcitonsillarum can produce similar inflammation but I am not sure if it includes eosinophils. Pepe Ramos

  5. Andre Broes
    23/03/2014

    De : aavld-request@ucdavis.edu [mailto:aavld-request@ucdavis.edu] De la part de Fabio Del Piero
    Envoyé : 22 mars 2014 14:22
    À : aavld@ucdavis.edu
    Objet : RE: Granulomatous pneumonia (of unknown cause) in a pig

    If it would be my case I would contact Roger Maes at MSU for a generic herpesvirus PCR from the paraffinized lung tissues. In case of positive result I would narrow the search toward gammaherpesviruses.

    It is vaguely reminiscent of some gammaherpesvirus associated lesions in horses.

    Fabio Del Piero
    Professor of Pathology
    Louisiana State University

    ==

  6. SESC
    20/03/2014

    Comment from Swine Health, Nutrition and Production Professionals group in LinkedIn:

    Rogerio Paulo Tovo
    Swanager

    Dear SESC went their differential diagnosis , and quick reference to the book Diseases of Swine of the Dr. Leman et al. , recommend researching Yersinia pseudotuberculosis , and very many smaller chance of occurrence for Brucella suis . Surely the case is atypical, disease macroscopia is suggestive of tuberculosis , and to a lesser extent atypical case of Staphylococcus aureus , cases that have been discarded by laboratory tests performed .
    The symptoms , if your lordship has access , it is important to suggest some way in these cases .
    Good luck in continuing the search , and when you find something , let us know . Hugs , Rogério Tovo – Brazil .

  7. Ted Clark
    19/03/2014

    I have not seen porcine lung lesions just like this, but given the negative test results so far and the giant cells present, I would next run IHC for PCV2. You could do PCR for PCV2 as well, but the virus is so ubiquitous a positive result would not confirm it caused these lesions.
    I assume you used a polarizer on the lesions looking for aspirated foreign material and crystals? A PAS stain might be worth doing as well.

Add Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *